paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
Coffee and consent

From Until Someone Wakes Up, a play written by Hamline University professor Carolyn Levy and a group of Macalester College students:

Waiter: Would you like some coffee?
Woman: Yes, please.
Waiter: Just say when. (Starts to pour.)
Woman: There. (He keeps pouring.) That's fine. (He pours.) Stop! (She grabs the pot; there is coffee everywhere.)
Waiter: Yes, ma'am.
Woman: Well, why didn't you stop pouring?
Waiter: Oh, I wasn't sure you meant it.
Woman: Look, of course I meant it! I have coffee all over my lap! You nearly burned me!
Waiter: Forgive me, ma'am, but you certainly looked thirsty. I thought you wanted more.
Woman: But -
Waiter: And you must admit, you did let me start to pour.
paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
"This, then, is the terrible bargain we have regretfully struck: Men are allowed the easy comfort of their unexamined privilege, but my regard will always be shot through with a steely, anxious bolt of caution." --Melissa @ Shakesville


Dear S.O.,

Read this please.

Love,
MJ.

"I hope those men will hear me when I say, again, I do not hate you. I mistrust you. You can tell yourselves that's a problem with me, some inherent flaw, some evidence that I am fucked up and broken and weird; you can choose to believe that the women in your lives are nothing like me.

Or you can be vigilant, can make yourselves trustworthy. Every day.

Just in case they're more like me than you think." --Melissa @ Shakesville
paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
Dear K,

Following our chat the other night about the reversed list of sexual assault prevention tips, please read the following snippet from another feminist:
We often see articles telling women that they need to be careful to not drink too heavily, or wear anything too revealing, or go out too late at night, otherwise they risk being raped. We hear people saying that abused women are to blame because they don’t leave. We see articles telling women that they can’t “have it all,” and must “choose” between a career and parenting. We hear that women need to “grow a thicker skin,” “toughen up” and “be one of the boys” to get ahead in the workplace.

Of course feminists realize that, actually, men need to stop raping and abusing women, job opportunities need to be more accommodating to parents and men need to become more involved in parenting roles, and employers need to stop condoning sexual harassment and start treating women as equal workers. But sadly, our mainstream media and culture don’t see that. And we’ve all bemoaned how frustrating that can be.

What all of these examples have in common is that they assume women are the problem. They assume that we need to adapt to the patriarchal structure, rather than admitting that the structure itself needs to evolve (hell, be removed) in order to create any opportunity for true equality. They say that sure, society will accept women as equals . . . as long as they sufficiently and quietly adapt to a system that was deliberately designed to exclude them.
paradox: close-up of an eye (eye)
Can heterosexual authors write excellent stories about LGBTQ people?

Possibly, but I imagine that it would be pretty damn difficult to ignore one's cis-privilege enough to be able to fully understand what queer people go through, in order to do it from a queer perspective that reads as authentic!

"I would love to hear someone say a gay writer has no business writing a straight character or women have no business writing a male character."

You're right. Minorities often can write from the perspective of the majority. You know why? Because the minority is surrounded by that majority perspective every single day. The minority often has to struggle against discrimination from that majority. The minority gets a good look at just how that majority works. And often, the minority learns this so that they can "fit in".

How often do you think that works in reverse?

I don't doubt that there are straight writers who can nail the experience of being queer.1 I just think that when you've got actual queer authors doing the same thing, which source should you go to first? The observer or the participant (so to speak)? And so, when you're searching for excellence in the field of queer lit, it makes sense to look at the work of queer authors. Doesn't it?

I get that in the case of the Lambda Literary Awards, one of the biggest objections is that the guidelines changed - and that stirred up some serious questions and issues for people. But honestly, some of that seems to be "borrowing trouble" and maybe peeps need to take a step back to relax & look at it again.

(In the interests of full disclosure, I am a bisexual "woman" who has the luxury of being identified as straight due to my current long term relationship with a straight man.  I don't hide my bisexuality, and if it comes up in conversation I confirm it, but that has rarely happened.)

1. I know that experiences of being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, queer etc all differ, but I think they certainly have something in common that a person with only the experience of being heterosexual in a heteronormative society lacks.
paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
Where to start?

[personal profile] jonquil summed it up rather nicely in a post that includes this on-point quote:
"a degree in neural networks cuts no ice when you're researching gendered behaviour in sexuality"

[livejournal.com profile] vanseedee contributed this hilarious post that shows just how strong the fail is:
They are doing serious research about subcortical circuits that are involved with romantic attraction, erotic arousal, emotional bonding, and sexual behavior.

Still with me? Wait for it.

The book will be called: "RULE 34: WHAT NETPORN TEACHES US ABOUT THE BRAIN".

I swear I'm not kidding and that's just the start.

And [community profile] linkspam has been awesome at archiving all the lulz.

I took the survey after seeing a banner on my flist - and before seeing any of the objections.  Well, I tried to take the survey.  I answered the first couple of questions, thinking to myself, "What is wrong with me?  I'm finding it impossible to answer these questions, and we haven't even gotten to the actual fanfic stuff yet!"  The multiple choice answers to questions about my gender, ethnicity, location etc were so bad that I was longing for a "please explain" text box option so that I could let them have real answers.

And then when I got to the fanfic stuff... well.  I closed my browser in disgust.  The questions were unanswerable.

The worst part is that I blamed myself for my inability to pick from their answers.  It didn't occur to me that my difficulty in doing so wasn't because of anything on my part, but because their questions were so bad and their assumptions so limited.  Only after I saw a post by [personal profile] eruthros  "titled please don't take the fan fiction survey" did I realise that there were a whole lot of problems with the actual survey questions and questionners.

And (the majority of) fandom's awesome response to this travesty of a survey has been brilliant to see.
paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
 Swedish parents keep 2-year-old's gender secret
 
Pop’s parents, both 24, made a decision when their baby was born to keep Pop’s sex a secret. Aside from a select few – those who have changed the child’s diaper – nobody knows Pop’s gender; if anyone enquires, Pop’s parents simply say they don’t disclose this information. 

In an interview with newspaper Svenska Dagbladet in March, the parents were quoted saying their decision was rooted in the feminist philosophy that gender is a social construction. 

“We want Pop to grow up more freely and avoid being forced into a specific gender mould from the outset,” Pop’s mother said. “It's cruel to bring a child into the world with a blue or pink stamp on their forehead.” 

Wow, good on them.  The rest of the article was very interesting, but the best part is the comments section.  I was astounded by how many negative comments there were: "This is tantamount to child abuse.", "These guys are insane!  Help the kid!" etc.  Is it really so bad to expect people to treat your child as a human being, rather than forcing our societally constructed ideas of gender upon them?  Is it really so bad to give your children choices about who they want to be?

When I was a little girl, I played with dolls and Tonka trucks, and it always frustrated me that because the trucks were my brother's, I was only allowed them when he okayed it.  I wanted trucks of my own, dammit.  If parents give their kids dresses and trousers, trucks and dolls, blue and pink and white and black choices, the kid can pick what they like, instead of what they're supposed to like. 

I guess you could say I'm pro-choice?
paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
 I do things that people do.

I woke up late this morning, and didn't bother to make my bed.  I had toast and coffee for breakfast, and left the dishes on the bench.  I showered and brushed my teeth.  I got dressed in jeans and a sweater because it was cool.  I sat at my desk to check my email, blogs and web comics.  I played World of Warcraft.

And then I did something that girl gamers do.

I explained the difference between a male treating a female like a sexual object and a female having a sexual identity to several males who just seen another male kicked out of their guild for repeatedly making sexual comments to a 16-year-old female guild member, even after she asked him to stop.  We had a discussion about power and stereotypes and human rights.

Why is this something that girl gamers do?  Because prior to my intervention, the guys had been joking around about the incident, including making sexual comments about the girl involved (things like "I'd like a piece of that young ass too").  You know, because when you joke about something, you obviously don't mean it, and therefore it's okay to keep saying it.  That way nobody will be offended.  As long as you put a smiley face at the end.  :)

This attitude is something gamers are especially prone to, as they're already in the mental zone to "relax, have fun" - and so everything becomes a source of amusement.  What they don't realise is that their fun can infringe on another's, and that's when it stops being okay.  When a 16-year-old girl doesn't want to raid with her guild because she doesn't want to play with a guy who can't take no for an answer, she isn't having fun.  When the females in guild have to type instead of being able to speak on Vent because they don't want to have to deal with the sexual comments that would ensue, they aren't having fun (trust me, there's a big difference in fun level when ya can't talk to your fellow gamers).

"But," Dave tells me, "There are lots of girl gamers who act like sex objects!"

"How do you mean?" I ask, "What do they do exactly?"

"Well... they make sexual innuendos and jokes!  They talk on Vent in low, bedroom voices!  They post their pics on the guild forums, usually with cleavage shots!"

So, in other words, they act like men with boobs.  Therefore it's okay to treat them as a non-person there for your gratification only?

"Well... no?"

Slut: a woman who acts like men do.

Grrl gamers

May. 4th, 2009 10:26 am
paradox: Closeup of an eye (wow)
In a recent post, [personal profile] ms_katonic linked to an article discussing geeky women and that got me to thinking. I too consider myself a geek - which is probably pretty typical of most Dreamwidth users as it stands! However, in addition to being obsessed with blog, auction & comic websites, I also spend a fair amount of time playing computer games. For most of the past four years, the game of choice has been World of Warcraft (and yes, I tried Warhammer Online instead, but my laptop couldn't handle it).

Because of this, I consider myself a geek and a gamer. )
paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
Quote provided by Darkhawk:
"A man once asked me--it is true that it was at the end of a very good dinner, and the compliment conveyed may have been due to that circumstance--how I managed in my books to write such natural conversation between men when they were by themselves. Was I, by any chance, a member of a larged, mixed family with a lot of male friends? I replied that, on the contrary, I was an only child and had practically never seen or spoken to any men of my own age till I was about twenty-five. 'Well,' said the man, 'I shouldn't have expected a woman [meaning me] to have been able to make it so convincing.' I replied that I had coped with this difficult problem by making my men talk, as far as possible, like ordinary human beings. This aspect of the matter seemed to surprise the other speaker; he said no more, but took it away to chew it over. One of these days it may quite likely occur to him that women, as well as men, when left to themselves, talk very much like human beings also."
--Dorothy L. Sayers

Profile

paradox: Closeup of an eye (Default)
paradox

December 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 10:55 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios